Client Collaborations
All Representative Cases
Representing Washington companies on appeal in disputes with their insurer regarding insurance coverage of business losses incurred due to COVID-19. See, e.g., ES Restaurants Group, Inc., et al v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, et al., No. 21-356646 (9th Cir.) (Ongoing)
Successfully represented landlord on appeal in a commercial forcible entry and detainer action to recover possession of space at the Clackamas Town Center.
Represented national telecommunication provider in an appeal challenging agency procurement process under Washington law.
Obtained a favorable decision for the Attorney General of Guam in the United States Supreme Court in a CERCLA action against the United States to recover the costs of removal and remedial actions incurred by Guam due to military contamination and operations on the island for decades. The decision, Territory of Guam v. United States, can be found here.
Successfully represented cylinder manufacturer in a challenge to a final EPA rule banning use of non-refillable cylinders in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The decision, Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International et al. v. EPA et al., can be found here.
Iván understands the unique interplay between antitrust law and education law. Iván regularly helps higher education institutions navigate the federal and state antitrust laws and works with them to establish safeguards to minimize the risk of antitrust scrutiny.
Building a portfolio for printed/extruded battery technologies.
Building a portfolio on direct air capture and other carbon dioxide reduction systems.